New Jersey’s New Hemp Bill 3235: Changes, Issues, and Potential Impact
New Jersey’s cannabis and hemp industries are experiencing a major transformation with the introduction of Senate Bill 3235 (also known as A-4461 in the Assembly). This bill, signed into law on September 12, 2024, by Governor Phil Murphy, aims to establish a regulated market for intoxicating hemp products. While the law represents a step towards addressing the need for oversight in this growing sector, it raises concerns about government overreach and its potential impact on the market. This article will explore the changes introduced by the bill, the issues it has created, and the potential winners and losers in this new regulatory landscape.
Key Changes Introduced by New Jersey’s Hemp Bill 3235
Senate Bill 3235 comes in response to the rise of intoxicating hemp products in New Jersey. These products, which meet the legal definition of hemp due to their low levels of delta-9 tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), often contain other forms of THC, such as delta-8 and delta-10. While these products have provided consumers with alternative options in the market, there has been a need for clearer regulations to ensure safety and transparency. However, the government’s response has raised concerns about overregulation.
Here are the key changes introduced by the bill:
-
Regulation of Intoxicating Hemp Products: The bill targets products that contain intoxicating forms of THC, such as delta-8 and delta-10. While the market has operated as a relatively free and open space, there was a need for smarter regulations to ensure consumer safety. Unfortunately, this bill introduces heavy restrictions, limiting the sale of these products to licensed cannabis businesses.
-
Age Restrictions: The bill introduces a firm 21+ age limit for the sale of any product containing detectable levels of THC. At Nothing But Hemp, we have always advocated for responsible age restrictions, as protecting minors from these products is essential. This part of the law is a welcome measure that aligns with our belief that intoxicating hemp products should be for adult consumers only.
-
Licensing Requirements: One of the biggest changes is that, within 30 days of the bill’s signing, only licensed cannabis businesses overseen by the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission (CRC) will be allowed to sell intoxicating hemp products. The free market will no longer apply to intoxicating hemp products, as unlicensed sellers, who have thrived in this sector, will be cut off from the opportunity to compete unless they acquire a license.
-
Intoxicating Hemp Beverages: A late amendment to the bill allows alcohol licensees (liquor stores and wholesalers) to sell intoxicating hemp beverages. However, this expansion of the market brings its own set of challenges, as it places hemp beverages under the regulatory eye of the CRC, which may not have the resources or expertise to manage this sector effectively.
-
Milligram Limits: The bill defines intoxicating hemp products as those containing more than 0.5 milligrams of THC per serving or more than 2.5 milligrams per package. These limits are far too restrictive. Nothing But Hemp believes in smarter, more consumer-friendly limits, such as capping gummies at 10 milligrams of THC per serving, with a maximum of 100 milligrams per package. For beverages, a cap of 10 milligrams per serving would strike a better balance between safety and consumer choice.
The Issues and Challenges of Bill 3235
Although the bill addresses the need for regulations, it has introduced several significant issues. Many businesses in the hemp industry, including Nothing But Hemp, believe that the law represents an unnecessary overreach that could stifle competition and limit consumer options. Governor Murphy himself acknowledged some of these challenges when signing the bill, signaling that further legislative revisions may be required.
1. Government Overreach in the Free Market
The New Jersey hemp market has operated as a relatively free market, allowing businesses to innovate and meet the diverse needs of consumers. While some regulations were certainly needed to ensure product safety and protect minors, the level of restriction introduced by Bill 3235 threatens to choke off competition. By limiting sales to licensed cannabis businesses, the government is overregulating a market that could thrive with more balanced rules.
At Nothing But Hemp, we believe in smart regulations that focus on the right areas. For example, restricting sales to individuals over 21 and implementing sensible milligram limits (100 mg per package, 10 mg per serving) would ensure consumer safety without stifling the market. However, this bill goes too far, potentially harming the innovation and variety that consumers have come to expect.
2. Unfair Advantage for Alcohol Licensees
The late amendment to the bill allowing alcohol licensees to sell intoxicating hemp beverages introduces another layer of complexity. While this opens up a new market for liquor stores and wholesalers, it gives them an unfair advantage over existing hemp and cannabis businesses that must follow much stricter regulations.
Cannabis businesses must adhere to stringent guidelines, including employee training, labor agreements, and compliance with local ordinances. In contrast, alcohol licensees are not required to meet the same standards, creating an uneven playing field. This undermines the spirit of fair competition and could disrupt the established cannabis market, which operates under far more rigorous oversight.
3. Confusion Over Product Origin and Interstate Commerce
One of the most confusing elements of the bill is the amendment regarding the phrase “in this State.” Some interpret this to mean that out-of-state hemp products can be sold in New Jersey as long as they meet the state’s definition of intoxicating hemp products. Others believe the bill restricts sales to products cultivated, derived, or manufactured within New Jersey.
This confusion could create a significant loophole, allowing out-of-state companies to sell products in New Jersey without following the same regulatory standards as local businesses. On the other hand, if the law does restrict sales to New Jersey-based products, it could raise constitutional issues related to interstate commerce. The Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution prohibits states from enacting protectionist policies that interfere with the free flow of goods across state lines.
4. Health and Safety Concerns
At Nothing But Hemp, we are committed to ensuring that consumers have access to safe, high-quality products. The rise of delta-8 and delta-10 THC products in the market has created some concerns about the safety of unregulated products, which may contain harmful additives or contaminants. While we support reasonable regulations to ensure product testing and transparency, the government’s heavy-handed approach in Bill 3235 could result in a more limited selection for consumers and potentially drive them to the black market.
The CRC, which is tasked with regulating these products, may struggle to enforce the new rules, particularly given the lack of resources allocated in the bill. If the regulatory framework is not effectively implemented, it could result in continued availability of unregulated, potentially dangerous products, undermining the bill’s intent to protect consumers.
5. Aggressive Implementation Timelines
The bill sets very short timelines for implementing the new regulatory framework. Within 30 days of the bill’s signing, it will be unlawful for unlicensed businesses to sell intoxicating hemp products. This aggressive timeline could lead to chaos in the market, as many businesses may struggle to obtain the necessary licenses or adapt to the new rules in such a short period.
Additionally, the CRC is expected to develop a regulatory framework for alcohol licensees selling intoxicating hemp beverages within a similarly short time frame. Given the complexities of this new market and the CRC’s limited resources, it is unclear whether the state will be able to meet these deadlines effectively.
Who Benefits from the New Law?
Several groups stand to benefit from the new regulations, although the benefits may depend on how effectively the law is implemented and whether the state addresses the outstanding issues.
1. Licensed Cannabis Businesses
The most immediate beneficiaries of the law are licensed cannabis businesses, which will now have exclusive rights to sell intoxicating hemp products. By limiting competition from unlicensed sellers, the bill gives these businesses greater control over the market. However, the benefits may be tempered by the introduction of alcohol licensees into the intoxicating hemp beverage market, creating new competition from an unexpected quarter.
2. Consumers
Consumers could benefit from the new law if it is implemented effectively. The regulations should ensure that intoxicating hemp products are tested, labeled, and sold responsibly, which could improve safety and transparency. However, if the state’s regulatory framework is too restrictive, consumers may face fewer choices and higher prices, which could drive some to the black market for unregulated products.
3. Alcohol Licensees
Alcohol licensees, including liquor stores and wholesalers, stand to benefit from the bill’s provision allowing them to sell intoxicating hemp beverages. This opens up a new revenue stream for these businesses, especially as the demand for hemp-derived THC beverages grows. However, the success of this new market will depend on the CRC’s ability to regulate it effectively.
Who Could Be Hurt by the New Law?
While some businesses and consumers may benefit, others could be negatively impacted by the new regulations.
1. Unlicensed Sellers of Intoxicating Hemp Products
Unlicensed sellers, who have thrived in the free market for intoxicating hemp products, will be the biggest losers under this law. Many of these businesses have built their customer base by offering delta-8 and delta-10 products, which will now be restricted to licensed cannabis businesses. These sellers will either have to shut down their hemp product sales or go through the costly and time-consuming process of obtaining a license.
2. Out-of-State Hemp Producers
If the law restricts the sale of intoxicating hemp products to those manufactured within New Jersey, out-of-state producers could face significant financial losses. Many of these businesses have relied on the New Jersey market to sell their delta-8 and delta-10 products. A restriction on interstate commerce would create a barrier for these businesses, reducing competition and potentially leading to higher prices for consumers. Additionally, such a restriction may trigger legal challenges based on the Commerce Clause, which protects the free flow of goods between states.
3. Consumers of Delta-8 and Delta-10 THC Products
Another group that could be hurt by the new law are consumers who have come to rely on delta-8 and delta-10 THC products. These products have gained popularity due to their similar effects to delta-9 THC but with slightly milder psychoactive properties. With the new regulations, consumers may find it more difficult to access these products, particularly if unlicensed sellers are pushed out of the market and licensed cannabis businesses prioritize other offerings. Additionally, the overly restrictive milligram limits in the bill may frustrate consumers who seek products with higher doses.
4. Small Business Owners and Entrepreneurs
Small businesses that have thrived in the relatively free market for hemp-derived products will be hit hardest by these new regulations. Many small, unlicensed businesses, such as independent retailers and e-commerce shops, will lose their ability to sell delta-8 and delta-10 products without obtaining a license. The licensing process itself can be costly and time-consuming, which may put it out of reach for smaller operators. This could lead to the consolidation of the market into the hands of larger, more established cannabis companies, leaving small businesses at a disadvantage.
Conclusion
New Jersey’s Senate Bill 3235 is a significant piece of legislation that will reshape the state’s market for intoxicating hemp products. While it addresses some legitimate concerns about product safety and protecting minors, it also introduces a level of government overreach that may stifle competition and limit consumer options. The introduction of strict milligram limits and the exclusion of unlicensed sellers from the market could negatively impact small businesses and consumers alike.
At Nothing But Hemp, we believe that a balanced approach to regulation is the best way forward. Smart, sensible restrictions—such as a 100 mg per package limit for gummies and a 10 mg cap per serving for beverages—would ensure consumer safety without unnecessarily limiting the market. However, Bill 3235 goes too far in some areas, and we hope that future legislative efforts will address these concerns to create a thriving, competitive, and safe hemp market for everyone.
In the meantime, the next few months will be critical as the New Jersey Cannabis Regulatory Commission works to implement the bill’s provisions. It remains to be seen how effectively the new regulatory framework will be enforced and whether additional legislation will be needed to address the bill’s shortcomings. Ultimately, the future of New Jersey’s hemp market will depend on striking the right balance between regulation and freedom—ensuring that businesses can innovate and consumers can access safe, high-quality products without unnecessary government interference.
